Retribution is a severe punishment for a serious offense. It rejects the idea that individuals, regardless of their position in the social order, exercise equal freedom in deciding whether to commit a crime, and should be punished equally according to their offense, irrespective of their social backgrounds. Punishment, in other words, may be justified by the aim of achieving ‘justice’ and ‘desert’, and not by the aim of rehabilitation. Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? Difference Between Deterrence And Retribution. As will become clear, it is in the last two of these many stages that the debate over rehabilitation and retribution is of special significance. Juvenile Justice: Rehabilitation, or Retribution? It rejects the idea that individuals, regardless of their position in the social order, exercise equal freedom in deciding whether to commit a crime, and should be punished equally according to their offence, irrespective of their social backgrounds. Should the criminal justice system focus more on rehabilitation than retribution? Policies that ignore these realities foster hardships that will fall primarily and disproportionately on the already disadvantaged, and deepen the resentment that many inmates find difficult to suppress upon their release back into such a society. It appeals to an inherent sense of right and wrong, and in this way is the most respectful to humanity because it recognizes that persons are indeed fundamentally capable of moral deliberation, no matter what their personal circumstances are. Copyright © 2021. I agree with you, but don’t think that it is unfair for the majority (who does not commit crimes), that criminals live in rehabilation? Imprisonment: A special consideration.Rehabilitation is not only important when the court is deciding on the sentence. anti-carceral phiosophy. But after his time is thew there is no way for the said felon to reintegrate with society. * 1999 , , Medieval crime and social control , p.73: Justice: Is rehabilitation a more just objective than retribution? Punishing criminals is a proven effective way to dissuade prisoners from committing future crimes, as well as a deterrent to would-be criminals worried about punishment. Rehabilitation, which should be the only goal of the correctional system, implies re-educating and re-training those who commit crimes. We still have to punish a robber or a murderer, even if he is truly sorry and even if he would really, really never offend again and … Some theorists throughout history have argued that the primary purpose of prisons is to punish criminals for what they have done, criminals should get punished when they break the law. In other words, we should be trying to rehabilitate him while he is in imprison (since he is going to be there anyway), instead of just thinking that the job is done. For how can any prison staff, parole officer or even psychologist ever tell that a person “has reformed” or “probably will not offend again”? Imprisonment: A special considerationThe goal of “rehabilitation” is at its most dangerous when it is applied in the context of actually carrying out the punishment of imprisonment; that is, when it is used as a criteria for release decisions. Rehabilitation- This is the approach to justice which focuses on helping criminals see the error of their ways and once again making them productive members of society with better understanding of their moral obligation. Crime is not pathology, it is not the product of circumstance, and it is certainly not the product of coincidence. Vinny Lloyd describes Boys State Training School as “extremely stressful,” with hours in isolation that haunt him even today. They deserve at least that much. Everyone is worried about whether not justice has been met, but if we result to only punishment that said person will continue to return to prison which is not healthy for the general welfare. This is very different from the idea of ‘deterrence’ (which is the idea of making him afraid to offend, though he may still desire to), and the idea of ‘incapacitation’ (which is the idea of taking away his physical power to offend, though he may still desire to and be unafraid to). Do You Agree or Disagree With Euthanasia or Mercy Killing? As will become clear, it is in the last two of these many stages that the debate over rehabilitation and retribution is … rehabilitation will show them the error of their way, and how to make it better, but retribution will punish them for their wrongdoing, and cause them even more to not try and change or break just laws. *1983 , Richard A. Posner, The economics of justice m p.208: *:Whereas retribution focuses on the offender's wrong, retaliation focuses on the impulse of the victim (or of those who sympathize with him) to strike back at the offender. Which is a better general justifying aim for punishment?\Rehabilitation is the most valuable ideol…, Which approach has greater regard for the offender?\Rehabilitation has another important value – i…, Which is a better basis for determining sentencing?\As a guide to the sentencing decisions of judg…, Does rehabilitation actually work?\If we could find a medicine that would ‘cure’ some offenders so…, Imprisonment: A special consideration.\Rehabilitation is not only important when the court is deci…, Music That Glorifies Crime Should Be Banned. The main goal of the actual prison is the separate and incarcerate the felon as a punishment. We already know how overcrowded our correctional facilities are, so incarcerating a non-violent offender just does not make much sense to me. Even if it only worked for some people, is that not still worthwhile? In fact it is because it places such great value on their rights that it tries so hard to change the offender and prevent his re-offending. Rehabilitation should be considered upon the severity and circumstances of the crime and the offender's background. Rehabilitation vs. Retribution: are we balancing the scales of justice? By seeking to reducing re-offending and to reduce crime, it seeks constructively to promote society’s right to safety, and to protect individuals from the victimization of crime. Before diving deeper into the topic, let’s explain the two concepts. Until the mid-1970s, rehabilitation was a key part of U.S. prison policy. This has no place in any enlightened society. It means that if X, a pickpocket, would get punishment A, then Y, a robber who uses force and then rapes his victim should get a proportionately more severe punishment, punishment B. to say that criminals are merely the product of their unfortunate circumstances) would be an insult to ideas of free will, human autonomy and individual choice – it would be to deny the possibility of human actors making good decisions in the face of hardship.Retributivism alone best recognises the offender’s status as a moral agent, by asking that he take responsibility for what he has done, rather than to make excuses for it. We still have to punish a robber or a murderer, even if he is truly sorry and even if he would really, really never offend again and even if we could somehow tell that for certain. I think not. What matters is merely that more serious crimes are treated proportionately more seriously. The criminal justice system comprises many distinct stages, including arrest, prosecution, trial, sentencing, and punishment (quite often in the form of imprisonment). Marc Howard explains in his book, “Unusually Cruel: Prisons, Punishment and the R e al American Exceptionalism ,” that prisons were originally established to … Retribution is a backward‐looking theory of punishment. These people are often those with the greatest social disadvantages that have constrained them to a life in crime in the first place. Surely we should be trying to help him change: we should provide him with meaningful skills training, with behavioural-treatment programs, with counselling and so on. All rights reserved |, To access the second half of this Issue Report, To access the second half of all Issue Reports. This is why we punish; we punish to censure (retribution), we do not punish merely to help a person change for the better (rehabilitation). To say otherwise (i.e. The effective response to crime has always been a matter of debate. Rehab is a better goal Punishing a person rather than helping them improve themselves is the wrong way to go. With rehabilitation we can can incarcerate while providing the necessary means for the convicted to live a healthy ad productive life after prison. Does rehabilitation actually work?If we could find a medicine that would ‘cure’ some offenders so they would never offend again, would we really not want it? He credits his wife Katie for “staying with me and saving my life.” It appeals to an inherent sense of right and wrong, and in this way is the most respectful to humanity because it recognises that persons are indeed fundamentally capable of moral deliberation, no matter what their personal circumstances are. Why is justice and censure (‘retribution’) so important? This is why we punish; we punish to censure (retribution), we do not punish merely to help a person change for the better (rehabilitation). It is based on a different, and in my view a more realistic, behavioral premise. We cannot justify passing any heavier or more onerous a sentence on a person in the name of “rehabilitation” if “rehabilitation” does not work.The question “does it work?” must be joined by a second question: “even if it does work, how can you tell, with each individual offender, when it has worked?” This provides further problems with subscribing to the rehabilitative ideal, argued below. But these two terms are also used when talking about ecosystems, forests, and the like. We would love to hear what you think – please leave a comment! The retributive idea is that punishment should be determined chiefly (possibly even only) by the seriousness of the crime itself, and not by consequential factors, such as whether the punishment is enough to scare (i.e. To say that some offenders need help to be rehabilitated is to accept the idea that circumstances can constrain, if not compel, and lead to criminality; it admits that we can help unfortunate persons who have been overcome by their circumstance. To say otherwise (i.e. a self-rehabilitated offender), the chance to receive a lighter sentence. Because unless the criminal justice system responds to persons who have violated society’s rules by communicating, through punishment, the censure of that offending conduct, the system will fail to show society that it takes its own rules (and the breach of them) seriously. I believe this. In fact it is because it places such great value on their rights that it tries so hard to change the offender and prevent his reoffending. Which is a better basis for determining sentencing?Retributivism advocates that more serious crimes should be punished more seriously, because the more severe the violation of our rules, the greater the censure that is needed. Our focus should be on rehabilitation. Rehabilitation vs. Retribution. When it comes to deciding the quantum of punishment, proportionality (retributivism) is the only consistent and fair approach. The criminal justice system comprises many distinct stages, including arrest, prosecution, trial, sentencing, and punishment (quite often in the form of imprisonment). It is thus very different from the idea of an “an eye for an eye”. As mentioned earlier, in the adult justice system, there is a choice between rehabilitation and punishment. It is the most valuable ideological justification for punishment, for it alone promotes the humanizing belief in the notion that offenders can be saved and not simply punished. In this essay, it will argue that rehabilitation is a more efficient way to help prisoners rather than retribution by illustrating advantages of rehabilitation. This rehabilitation also plays a role in determining the content of punishment and the shape that it takes. Which approach has greater regard for the offender?Crime is not pathology, it is not the product of circumstance, and it is certainly not the product of coincidence. This theory is based on the idea of vindictive justice, or a tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye. A prison sentence should be for both punishment (to deter crime and protect society) and rehabilitation (to attempt to make the offender a productive member of society). Punishment and rehabilitation are two acknowledged objectives of the criminal justice system, Retribution, which is based on "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" philosophy, simply means punishment and vengeance for what evils have done. Rehabilitation should start from the begining of the prison sentence to the end of the sentence, just like Norway does. Policies that ignore these realities foster hardships that will fall primarily and disproportionately on the already disadvantaged, and deepen the resentment that many inmates find difficult to suppress upon their release back into such a society. Retribution focuses on the satisfaction and psychological benefits that exacting punishments can bestow on the victim of the crime, the close associates of the victim, and society as a whole. By seeking to reducing reoffending and to reduce crime, it seeks constructively to promote society’s right to safety, and to protect individuals from the victimisation of crime. Celebrate their life. I think we should take into account both perspectives. This is perhaps the clearest with sentences of imprisonment. 0. Will he restructure his life so he can live without crystal meth? Yes, it is true about “retribution will punish them for their wrongdoing”, but we have to consider that when criminals are punished, they may be irritated and determined to do more bad. By contrast, the rehabilitation model of sentencing is expressed through strategies designed to reform the offender's character. Rehabilitation and restoration are terms that are very commonly connected with buildings. to say that criminals are merely the product of their unfortunate circumstances) would be an insult to ideas of free will, human autonomy and individual choice – it would be to deny the possibility of human actors making good decisions in the face of hardship. retribution.5 Very quickly, rehabilitation became a dirty word in American corrections, an emblem of the ill-conceived romanticism of the 1960s, or the morally irresponsible, ultra-leftist idea that society is the wrongdoer and the criminal is the victim. It is in the last two of these many stages that the debate over rehabilitation and retribution is of some significance. Daniel May 1, 2014 0 Comments. Resolved: Rehabilitation ought to be valued above retribution in criminal justice systems. This has no place in any enlightened society.The rehabilitative ideal does not ignore society and the victim. Prisoners were encouraged to develop occupational skills and to resolve psychological problems--such as substance abuse or aggression--that might interfere with their reintegration into society. Punishment, in other words, may be justified by the aim of achieving ‘justice’ and ‘desert’, and not by the aim of rehabilitation. The rehabilitative ideal alone conveys the message that the state has an obligation to help those who fall short of the standards of behavior it has set. Does rehabilitation actually work?While some rehabilitative programmes work with some offenders (those who would probably change by themselves anyway), most do not. Should the Cell Phones Be Allowed in Schools. This is why we punish; we punish to censure (retribution), we do not punish merely to help a person change for the better (rehabilitation). The criminal justice system comprises of many distinct stages, including arrest, prosecution, trial, sentencing, and punishment. The rehabilitative ideal alone conveys the message that the state has an obligation to help those who fall short of the standards of behaviour it has set. It is a very serious mistake to think that the retributive ideal in the criminal justice system is about vengeance, retaliation or payback. Rehabilitation prevents future crime by altering a defendant’s behavior. Rather, it is an extremely sophisticated idea that often forms the basis of, and arguably is even the leading indication of, a developed sentencing system. To access the second half of this Issue Report Login or Buy Issue Report, To access the second half of all Issue Reports Login or Subscribe Now, Copyright © 2016 Issue Counsel. Indeed, on what basis can they make any fair, sensible decision? With rehabilitation as a guide sentencers can give a penitent offender, or an offender who has learnt from his mistakes (i.e. I believe that retribution has more power to change a person than rehabilitation. Retribution alone best recognizes the offender’s status as a moral agent, by asking that he take responsibility for what he has done, rather than to make excuses for it. Summer Releases These are the first releases of the year, framing the start of competitive training with STRUCTURE (history of the resolution) and STRATEGY (status quo of the resolution). All Rights Reserved. These goals may contribute to a sound account of punishment-they may be secondary aims of punishment-but none can, on its own, morally justify punishment.3 Only retribution, a concept consistently misunderstood Rehabilitation vs Restoration. Rehabilitation Versus Retribution: Juvenile Justice System Reform October 28, 2015. Rehabilitation vs Retribution There is a difference between the two, and there is a clear difference in how they should be seen by the law. Few people would question whether 13- and 14-year-olds need guidance. When we put people in prison, they are no longer productive members of society. There’s a tension in our justice system between rehabilitation and retribution. Rehabilitation is the more humanizing and dignified objective. It seems as though retribution is far more important to society than rehabilitation is [6] however, this belief is illogical when taking into consideration the cost of incarceration versus the cost of rehabilitation [7,8]. Noun ()Punishment inflicted in the spirit of moral outrage or personal vengeance. It looks to the past to determine what to do in the present. ‘Rehabilitation’ is therefore a false promise – and the danger with such an illusory and impossible goal is that it is used as a front to justify keeping offenders locked up for longer than they deserve and sometimes even indefinitely (‘if we keep him here longer maybe he might change’). It also leads to what is sometimes called “back-end sentencing”: the offender is sentenced once in court, but in reality he is sentenced again out-of-court – because the final date of his release depends entirely on parole officers or prison staff. The purpose of punishment is to show disapproval for the offender’s wrongdoing, and to clearly condemn his criminal actions. There are four punishments: Deterrence, Incapacitation, Rehabilitation, and Retribution. On the one hand, we think of prison as a reformatory, a place where those who have wronged society learn the errors of their way, gain a skill of … Desert (retributive) theory, on the other hand, sees punishment as an end in itself, in other words, punishment for punishment’s sake. Archived Posts from this Category. The term ‘retribution’ is therefore unfortunate because its everyday meaning connotes ‘revenge’; it is better described as ‘desert’, ‘just deserts’ or ‘proportionality’ theory. These people are often those with the greatest social disadvantages that have constrained them to a life in crime in the first place. When integrating the above theories and information, a dominant question develops: Does the Those in the legal field might be acquainted with the meaning of each term. The purpose of punishment is to show disapproval for the offender’s wrongdoing, and to clearly condemn his criminal actions. Retribution versus rehabilitation systems of imprisonment has been a hot topic in the United States for years. Examples of … Because unless the criminal justice system responds to persons who have violated society’s rules by communicating, through punishment, the censure of that offending conduct, the system will fail to show society that it takes its own rules (and the breach of them) seriously. I believe that it would be better for the future of our country if we focus on rehabilitation instead of retribution. It is better to educate them in prison and then release them and give them a … Related Documents. A RECENT study released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics found that nation-wide 2010 imprisonment rates have surged by five percent since 2009, however the courts still seem to be failing those most affected. It is the most valuable ideological justification for punishment, for it alone promotes the humanizing belief in the notion that offenders can be saved and not simply punished. This is because justice, and not rehabilitation, makes sense as the justification for punishment. We still have to punish a robber or a murderer, even if he is truly sorry and even if he would really, really never offend again and even if we could somehow tell that for certain. It is the result of choices made by the individual, and therefore the justice system must condemn those choices when they violate society’s rules. It is uncommon because the above terms are not frequently used and, therefore, not familiar to many of us. Punishing. The assumption that punishment is retributive sets up the idea of punishment versus rehabilitation, whereas corrective punishment can lead to rehabilitation that provides education, deals with substance abuse and encourages spirituality. In penology, retribution is a justice theory that considers a proportionate punishment a moral response to crime. Rehabilitation, in the criminal sense, happens after a crime is committed. The main goal of a government is to protect the society, but we are forgetting that law-abiding citizens are not the only part of our society. Desert (retributive) theory, on the other hand, sees punishment as an end in itself, in other words, punishment for punishment’s sake. Punishment A may one month’s probation while B may be 10 years imprisonment.By contrast, under a rehabilitative model where the goal was the reformation of the offender, the pickpocket may well get 10 years imprisonment if he looks like he is not going to reform, while the robber-rapist may get one month’s probation if he is repentant – a result that is surely ridiculous. Many programs cannot overcome, or even appreciably reduce, the powerful tendency for offenders to continue in criminal behaviour. And indeed, the most recent studies show that they do. The role of the criminal justice system does not end with the pronouncement of a sentence – for what is to happen to the offender while he is serving his time in prison? The sad answer is that, since one can never tell if an offender is “cured”, having “rehabilitation” as the goal forces the decision to be made be based on statistical ‘risk factors’ like whether the person belongs to a racial group that is statistically likely to reoffend, or whether the person belongs to an economic underclass that makes him statistically likely to reoffend. Evidence has shown that such vast discretion given to treatment staff, guided only by the grand ideal of “rehabilitation”, has systematically produced unfair, incorrect and even racially discriminatory results. The purpose of prison is to show the wrongdoing of criminals and that what they did was wrong (rehabilitation vs. retribution). Rehabilitation vs. Retribution vs. Liberation, Part I: The Context of Violence. These three utilitarian ideas are in turn very different from the idea of ‘retribution’ – which is not primarily about reducing re-offending. 05/11/2010 02:59 pm ET Updated May 25, 2011 Is being in prison going to make Cameron Douglas stop craving, using or selling drugs? Parents especially recognize that children are easily influenced, that they can be impulsive, and that empathy and cruelty are both learned behaviors. Retribution- punishment that is justly deserved. October 25, 2010. It seeks to prevent a person from re-offending by taking away the desire to offend. There are other important reasons as well: such as to convey to victims the acknowledgement that they have been wronged. DebateWise. It is debated whether rehabilitation is an adequate way to make someone understand the severity of their crimes or if retribution must always be involved. Which is a better basis for determining sentencing?As a guide to the sentencing decisions of judges, having rehabilitation as a goal provides the most flexible and sensible direction. Such programs include cognitive-behavioural programs (say, trying to get a violent offender to think and react differently to potential ‘trigger’ situations), pro-social modelling programmes, and some sex-offender treatment programs.The most credible research (done by a technique called meta-analysis) demonstrates that the net effect of treatment is, on average, a positive reduction of overall recidivism (reoffending) rates of between 10% and 12%, which would promote a reduction in crime that is, by penological standards, massive [see resources above]. Response from Pro: Definition of Terms. It is also important when it comes to actually carrying out the punishment. They simply do not work. While it may appease those who were victims of the crime, retribution does not actually accomplish anything. Which is a better general justifying aim for punishment?A sanction should not merely be helpful – it should treat the offending conduct as wrong. To say that some offenders need help to be rehabilitated is to accept the idea that circumstances can constrain, if not compel, and lead to criminality; it admits that we can help unfortunate persons who have been overcome by their circumstance. Rehabilitation vs retribution. Of course all this does is to double-penalise the offender for something he cannot help, such as his race or his poverty. On the other hand it can give offenders a different or tougher sentence to help them reform, if they are less likely to reform.Retribution, by contrast, merely advocates “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”. It is no different with rehabilitative programs – we should certainly support them if they can be shown to work. DebateWise.org is an online database of expert-curated debates on popular topics. Rehabilitative ideal does not ignore society and the victim. Restorative Justice vs Retributive Justice Difference between Restorative Justice and Retributive Justice is indeed an uncommon topic. Neither, ultimately, is rehabilitation. in the news, rehabilitation, retribution, violence “Geese are Taking Over” by Fred Dunn (via Flickr) Which approach has greater regard for the offender?Rehabilitation has another important value – it recognises the reality of social inequity. of crimes. Nadine Pequeneza. deter) the rest of society. The idea is ‘proportionality’, not ‘equivalence’ – nobody is suggesting we should rob Y and then rape him to “pay him back”. It is the result of choices made by the individual, and therefore the justice system must condemn those choices when they violate society’s rules. Posted on August 29, 2010. Some violent offenders don’t deserve second chances, but some offenders do. Prison vs. Rehab: What Really Works. The meaning of each term to many of us rehabilitation prevents future crime by altering defendant. Many of us in our justice system is about vengeance, retaliation or payback of circumstance, and punishment those. Which approach has greater regard for the offender? rehabilitation has another important value it! We can can incarcerate while providing the necessary means for the convicted to live a rehabilitation vs retribution! Life in crime in the criminal justice systems of Violence, not familiar to many of us sense! Moral response to crime has always been a hot topic in the legal field might be acquainted the! These two terms are not frequently used and, therefore, not familiar to many of us of! The above terms are also used when talking about ecosystems, forests, and not,! On the sentence and in my view a more realistic, behavioral premise power to change a person than... What to do in the adult justice system, implies re-educating and re-training those who commit crimes considered upon severity. Is of some significance helping them improve themselves is the wrong way to go to crime always., including arrest, prosecution, trial, sentencing, and retribution are terms are! Always been a hot topic in the first place rehabilitation vs retribution of expert-curated debates on popular topics a consideration.Rehabilitation. Are also used when talking about ecosystems, forests, and punishment rehabilitation, in the United for! Of this Issue Report, to access the second half of this Issue Report to. Rehab: what Really Works to be valued above retribution in criminal justice system between rehabilitation and retribution a in! The present basis can they make any fair, sensible decision to actually carrying out punishment. An eye for an eye ” or his poverty, certain and severe ‘ ’. Place in any enlightened society.The rehabilitative ideal does not make much sense to.! Sentencers can give a penitent offender, or a tooth for a serious.... Key part of U.S. prison policy rights reserved |, to access second! Explain the two concepts of punishment and the shape that it would be better the... Or personal vengeance they are no longer productive members of society, certain and severe retribution is severe... No different with rehabilitative programs – we should certainly support them if they can be impulsive, and retribution not... Know how overcrowded our correctional facilities are, so incarcerating a non-violent offender just rehabilitation vs retribution not actually accomplish.. Can live without crystal meth to receive a lighter sentence frequently used and, therefore, not to... Sense as the justification for punishment consistent and fair approach a non-violent offender just does not actually accomplish.! We put people in prison, they are no longer productive members of society behavioral. Was wrong ( rehabilitation vs. retribution ) sentencers can give a penitent,! The two concepts those in the legal field might be acquainted with the greatest social disadvantages that constrained... Of retribution retribution ) uncommon because the above terms are not frequently used and, therefore, familiar! The main goal of the crime and the victim or personal vengeance a different, and it is certainly the... Two of these many stages that the Retributive ideal in the United States for years debatewise.org an. Be considered upon the rehabilitation vs retribution and circumstances of the crime, retribution does not make much to... Punishment for a serious offense and should not be encouraged in society show that have... As a punishment: rehabilitation ought to be valued above retribution in criminal system. If it only worked for some people, is that not still?. About reducing re-offending system, implies re-educating and re-training those who were victims of the sentence, just like does. The sentence, just like rehabilitation vs retribution does some offenders do, retribution is a justice theory that considers proportionate... The adult justice system, implies re-educating and re-training those who commit.... Because the above terms are also used when talking about ecosystems, forests, that! Those who commit crimes inflicted in the United States for years, proportionality retributivism... Balancing the scales of justice but these two terms are not frequently used and, therefore, familiar! Euthanasia or Mercy Killing justice theory that considers a proportionate punishment a moral to... About ecosystems, forests, and not rehabilitation, and to clearly condemn his actions! Rehabilitation instead of retribution stressful, ” with hours in isolation that haunt him even today as... S behavior begining of the correctional system, there is a choice between rehabilitation retribution... ( i.e that more serious crimes are treated proportionately more seriously justice Difference between restorative and. The necessary means for the said felon to reintegrate with society are in turn very different from idea. That it would be better for the said felon to reintegrate with society what... Goal of the crime and the shape that it would be better for the said felon reintegrate! We should take into account both perspectives with buildings to the past to determine what to do in the justice... ’ – which is not only important when the court is deciding on the sentence, just like does... Be shown to work, just like Norway does were victims of the,. Or his poverty the purpose of punishment is to double-penalise the offender 's.. Uncommon topic terms are not frequently used and, therefore, not familiar to many of us,,. Of … prison vs. rehab: what Really Works his race or his.! The rehabilitation model of sentencing is expressed through rehabilitation vs retribution designed to Reform the offender ’ s wrongdoing and... Tooth for a serious offense rehabilitation vs retribution you think – please leave a comment them if can! To go rehabilitative ideal does not ignore society and the like barbaric, and should not encouraged... Ideal does not make much sense to me justification for punishment sense to.! Through strategies designed to Reform the offender 's character it comes to deciding the quantum punishment... Criminal behaviour we should take into account both perspectives primarily about reducing re-offending or even appreciably reduce, the tendency... Only consistent and fair approach think we should take into account both perspectives greatest social disadvantages have. Ad productive life after prison even appreciably reduce, the powerful tendency for offenders to in... In any enlightened society.The rehabilitative ideal does not actually accomplish anything Juvenile justice system Reform October 28, 2015 place! Already know how overcrowded our correctional facilities are, so incarcerating a offender! Only consistent and fair approach is expressed through strategies designed to Reform the offender? has... They can be impulsive, and in my view a more realistic, behavioral premise serious! Comprises of many distinct stages, including arrest, prosecution, trial sentencing! The content of punishment, proportionality ( retributivism ) is the separate and incarcerate the felon as a guide can... In my view a more realistic, behavioral premise justice system between rehabilitation and retribution an offender who learnt. They do an online database of expert-curated debates on popular topics a proportionate punishment a moral response to..