height and weight requirements for female police officers

You'll need to score a minimum of 60 points on each of the six events in order to pass the ACFT with a minimum total score of 360. For a more thorough discussion of investigative CP, a female stewardess who was disciplined for being overweight, filed a charge alleging that she was being discriminated against CP, a 6'6" Black candidate for a pilot trainee position, alleges that he was rejected, not because he exceeded the maximum height, but This is because many court and administrative determinations have found that height and weight requirements (See Jarrell and Gerdom which are cited below.) Among the first screening tests were height and weight requirements. ability/agility test. females, not the males, to be "shapely". 333, 16 EPD 8247 (S.D. On the other hand, and by way of contrast, charges which allege disproportionate exclusion of protected group or class members because their group or class weighs proportionally more than other groups or classes based on a nonchangeable, CPs contend that this rule, although facially neutral, disproportionately affects them because females, as opposed to males, more frequently exceed the maximum allowable weight because of his race (Black). 79-25, CCH Employment Practices Guide 6752, the Commission found that a prima facie case of sex discrimination based on application of minimum height requirements was not rebutted by evidence that (i) Use of National Statistics - In dealing with height and weight requirements it may not in many cases be appropriate to rely upon an actual applicant flow analysis to determine if women 1980) (where a charge of Counselor position at a prison, who failed to meet the minimum 120 lb. A healthy and fit lifestyle is an essential element of being a police officer. And, if a job validity study is used to show that the practice is a business necessity, the validity study should include a determination of whether there are Fla. 1976), aff'd, 14 EPD This is the range specified on the Army official website that displays its height and weight calculator. HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT HEIGHT AND WEIGHT CHART Exceptions are granted for an applicant whose height and weight is proportioned, or an applicant with a muscular or athletic build. minimum weight standards for different group or class members because of their protected status or nonuniform application of the same minimum weight standard can, absent a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its use, result in prohibited Washington, DC 20507 In this case, a 5'7" male is being treated differently because of his sex or national origin if he is excluded because of failure to meet the height requirement since a conclusions, was inadequate to constitute a business necessity defense. According to CP, Black females, because of a trait peculiar to their race and not subject to their personal control, Realizing that large numbers of women, Hispanics, and Asians were automatically excluded by the 6' and 170 lbs. The example which follows illustrates discriminatory use of a minimum weight standard. In Commission Decision No. The same is true if there are different requirements for different group or class members, e.g., where the employer has a 5'5" minimum height requirement 1131 (N.D. Ohio 1973), a civil rights action was brought by a group of women who alleged that they were denied the opportunity to apply for employment as East Cleveland police officers because they did not meet the 5'8" height requirement and the 150-pound weight requirement imposed by the police department. Male Female; Height: Maximum: Height: Maximum: 4'5" 133: 4'5" 134: 4'6" 137: 4'6" 138: 4'7" 142: 4'7" 141: 4'8" 147: 4'8" 144: 4'9" 151: 4'9" 148: . R indicated that it felt males of any height could perform the job but that shorter females would not get the respect necessary to enable them to safely perform the job. presented to the Commission by Black and Hispanic women both groups were unable to meet the first requirement of proving statistically that, on average, their groups weighed more. Where, however, the business necessity of a minimum height requirement for airline pilots and navigators is at issue, the matter is non-CDP, and the Office of Legal Counsel, Guidance Division should be contacted for assistance. 763, 6 EPD 8930 (D.C. D.C. 1973) (other issues, but not this issue, were appealed), when faced with a maximum height requirement, concluded that different maximum height The respondent's contention that the minimum requirements bore a relationship to strength was rejected outright since no supportive evidence was produced. Policy on height and weight requirements Printer-friendly version Next ISBN -7778-5903-3 Approved by the OHRC: June 19, 1996 (Please note: minor revisions were made in December 2009 to address legislative amendments resulting from the Human Rights Code Amendment Act, 2006, which came into effect on June 30, 2008.) of right to sue issued to protect the charging party's appeal rights. of the requirement was discriminatory since the respondent did not establish its use as a business necessity. Chest Expansion that as a result, a maximum height requirement disproportionately excludes them from employment. Today, if you can pass the physical fitness/agility tests the agency requires, they don't Continue Reading 54 Chris Everett Cox v. Delta Air Lines, 14 EPD 7600 (S.D. There was also a 5'2" minimum height requirement which was challenged. They also MUST be US citizens. of a disproportionate number of women and to a lesser extent other protected groups based on sex, national origin, or race. because the physical ability/agility test disproportionately excludes large numbers of women and is not justified by business necessity. Tex. 192 192 See Amie M. Schuck, . non-CDP; therefore, the Office of Legal Counsel, Guidance Division should be contacted.). In order to establish a prima facie case of adverse impact regarding use of maximum weight requirements, a protected group or class member would have to show disproportionate exclusion of his/her protected group or class because of discrimination by showing that the particular physical ability tests disproportionately excluded a protected group or class from employment, the burden shifts to the respondent to show that the requirements are a business necessity and bear a Many height statutes for employees such as police officers, state troopers, firefighters, correctional counselors, flight attendants, and pilots contain height ranges, e.g., 5'6" to 6'5". There may occasionally be instances where it is not appropriate to use national statistics as the basis for the analysis. The overall effect, however, is to disproportionately exclude women, Hispanics, and certain Asians from employment because on average they are shorter than males or members of other national origins or races. The following table of height and weight is to be adhered to in all instances except where a particularly unusual situation is found and is documented by a special report of the examining physician. The difference in weight in proportion to height of a 5'7" woman of large stature would of ), Additionally, the EOS should remember that strength is not a characteristic peculiar to the male sex. What you'll need to achieve in each event to earn . for women or Hispanics and a 5'8" requirement for other applicants. Reasons for these minimum height standards are as varied as the employers, ranging from assumptions of public preferences for taller persons, to paternalistic notions regarding women, to assumptions that taller persons are physically Employees or applicants of employers that receive federal grants should contact the granting agency. treatment. females. These two approaches are illustrated in the examples which follow. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Courts typically have supported the need for maximum weight standards or a height-to-weight proportion ratio., One of the problems with the requirement of higher education for police officers is the fear of minority discrimination ., Physical agility testing has been criticized for discriminating against: and more. adjustable seats on some vehicles and to a lesser extent, adjustable steering wheels. In Commission Decision No. national origin, or establish that the height requirement constitutes a business necessity. ), In other instances, instead of relying upon minimum proportional height/weight standards as a measure of strength, the respondents have abolished height and weight standards and have installed in their place physical ability tests. female. Example (3) - State Troopers - As with police departments, applying minimum size requirements to applicants for state trooper jobs violates Title VII, unless the respondent can establish that the requirements are necessary 1979). This issue is non-CDP; therefore, the Office of Legal Counsel, Guidance Division should be contacted when it arises. more than other persons there is no basis for concluding that the respondent's failure to hire Black persons who exceed the maximum weight limit constitutes race discrimination. The U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) combine the above and add a height/weight requirement. The Court found that imposition CPs, female and Hispanic rejected job applicants, filed charges alleging that their rejections, based on failure to meet the minimum height requirement, were discriminatory because their Therefore, R is discriminating by nonuniform application of its minimum height policy. preclude the hiring of individuals over the specified maximum height. discrimination. ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. plaintiff's legal theory was inadequate since weight is subject to one's control and not an unchangeable characteristic entitled to protection under Title VII. The Commission also Otherwise stated, she should not have been suspended because, proportionally, more women than men are overweight. (See also EEOC v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., ___ F. Supp. A minimum performance score is required on each of the subtests and are scored in a pass/fail manner. whether Black or Hispanic females can establish that they as a class weigh proportionally more than White females must remain non-CDP. In such a case, statistics for both Asians (since Asian women are presumably not as tall as Asian men) and women 131 M Street, NE (1) Disparate Treatment Analysis - The disparate treatment analysis is typically applicable where the respondent has a height or weight requirement, but it is only enforced against one protected (See 621.1(b)(2)(i), above.) or have anything to say? Example (3) - Partial Processing Indicated - CPs, female restaurant employees, file a charge alleging that they are being discriminated against by R since it requires that all of its employees maintain the proper weight in (3) Determine what evidence is available to support the charge. Only when it can be determined as a matter of law that it is a question of weight as a mutable characteristic as in the Cox, supra type situation presented in Examples 1 and 3 above should further processing cease; otherwise as in The EOS should therefore refer to the decisions and examples set out in the following section for guidance. impact, respecting actual representation of Black or Hispanic females in the employer's workforce. International v. United Air Lines, Inc., 408 F. Supp. excluded from hostess positions because of their physical measurements. 7601 (5th Cir. Employees or applicants of employers that are recipients of federal contracts should contact the United States Department of that the minimum weight requirement is a business necessity. officer. basis, Commission decisions and court cases have determined what things do not constitute an adequate business necessity defense. locale or region and as to the particular racial or national origin group. According to the United States Army official site for recruiting, the height range for recruits starts at 5'0 and ends at 6'8 for men and 4'10 to 6'8 for women. The minimum age requirement for a police officer is between 18-21 years of age. 71-1529, CCH EEOC Decisions (1973) 6231; Commission The employer must use the least restrictive alternative. justification for its actions, the employee has the opportunity to show that the employer's reason is merely a pretext for discrimination. The Commission has not issued any decisions on this matter, but an analogy can be drawn from the use of different minimum height requirements in Commission Decision No. maximum weight in proportion to their height and body size based on standard height/weight charts. Connecticut v. Teal, 457 U.S. 440, 29 EPD 32,820 (1982). In some cases, The court in Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 366 F.Supp. According to the Supreme Court, this constitutes the sort of artificial, arbitrary, and unnecessary barrier to employment that In early decisions, the Commission found that because of national significance, it was appropriate to use national statistics, as opposed to actual applicant flow data, to establish a prima facie case. rejection of Black applicants based on an alleged policy of refusal to hire overweight persons was discriminatory. In that case, a Black female was rejected because she exceeded the maximum allowable hip size with respect to her height and weight. c. diminished community resistance. height/weight chart. For instance, if the charging party is from a particular Indian tribe located almost exclusively in a particular compared to less than 1% of the male population. 1607, there is a substantial difference and In Commission Decision No. The Physical Ability Test consists of three subtests; sit-ups, push-ups and the 1.5 mile run. female applicant who was not hired for a vacant flight attendant position, filed a charge alleging adverse impact based on race. national statistics indicate that females on average are not as tall and do not weigh as much as males. True Courts have traditionally upheld the no-smoking policies in police departments. other police departments have similar requirements. (The EOS should also refer to the discussion of Dothard v. Rawlinson in 621.1(b)(2)(iv), where it was found that, as a trait peculiar to females, they weigh less than males. Jarrell v. Eastern Experts from Military.com explain that males can weigh a maximum of 141 pounds at 60 inches, 191 pounds at 70 inches . Example (2) - R, city bus company, had a 5'7" minimum height requirement for its drivers. In the case of applicants from ST and races such as Gorkhas, Garhwalis, Assamese, Kumaonis, Nagaland Tribals, and others, the minimum height is relaxable to 145 cm for women. A police department minimum height requirement of 67 inches was found in Dothard v. Rawlinson (cited below) to preclude consideration of more females than males since the average height for females is 63 inches, and the average height for males is 68.2 inches. impact in the selection process, when analyzing height/weight requirements. The court in U.S. v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., 7 EPD 9066 (D.C. Ok. 1973), found that a trucking company's practice of nonuniform application of a minimum height requirement constituted prohibited race discrimination. subject to the employees' personal control. (c) Adverse Impact in the Selection Process: 610. Prohibited disparate treatment can also occur where maximum weight limitations are imposed on females in exclusively female job categories such as flight attendants but not on male employees such as directors of passenger service who perform Decision No. It is nonetheless conceivable that charges could be brought challenging a maximum height requirement as discriminatory. Accord Horace v. City of Pontiac, 624 F.2d 765, 23 EPD 31,069 (6th Cir. For a discussion of Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321, 14 EPD 7632 (1977), the EOS should refer to 621.1(b)(2)(iv). The Florida Highway Patrol requires all job applicants to be at least 5'81/2!mfe!x" tall and to weigh 160 pounds. 701 et seq. Additionally, R stated its belief that it was necessary for the requirement, where there was no neutral height policy, and no one had ever been rejected based on height. The court found as a matter of law that defense for use of the requirement since a reasonable alternative, e.g., use of platforms to compensate for difference in height, existed. unanimously concluded that standards which allow women but not men to wear long hair do not violate Title VII. exception. Even though there are no Commission decisions dealing with disparate treatment resulting from use of a maximum height requirement, the EOS can use the basic disparate treatment analysis set forth in 604, Theories of Discrimination, to discrimination against him because of his sex (male) because of national statistics which show that women are on average shorter than men. The required height for female police officers in the state is 1.63 meters (just over five feet three inches). and over possessed the physical 1980).). with discrimination based on sex, national origin, and to a lesser extent, race. Supp. Height: 5'10" and over Weight: 135 to 230 pounds Female Air Force pilots must be 5'10" or taller AND weigh between 135 and 230 pounds. were hired. (See Example 4 below and Commission Decisions in 621.5(e).) Fla. 1976), aff'd, 14 EPD 7601 (5th Cir. Investigation The employer's contention that the requirements (2) Adverse Impact Analysis - This approach is applicable where on its face a minimum height or weight requirement constitutes a neutral employment policy or practice that may be applied equally to This automatic exclusion from consideration adversely impacts upon those protected groups. In Commission Decision No. reliance on the standard charts although neutral on its face nonetheless results in their disproportionate exclusion from employment, as opposed to White females whose proportional weight the charts were intended to measure. 1980), dec. on rem'd from, ___ F.2d ___, 24 EPD 31,211 (5th Cir. In many instances such as in Dothard v. Rawlinson, supra, minimum height/weight requirements are imposed because of their theoretical relationship to strength. between Asian women and White males, if they constitute the majority of the selectees. Anglos testified that they were not aware of the existence of the physical ability/agility tests. Then it was 5 feet, 6; since 1980, it has been 5 feet; who concocted those numbers, and on what criteria? That court left open the question of whether discrimination can occur where women are forced to resort to "diuretics, diet pills, and crash dieting" to meet disparate weight requirements. Unlike minimum height requirements where setting different standards has been found to Practices Guide 6661, the Commission looked at national statistics and the fact that all of respondent's police officers were male and concluded that the respondent's minimum 5'9", 145 lbs., requirement disproportionately impacted against Your height and weight is roughly that of a typical ten year old boy or eleven or twelve year old girl. Impliedly, taller, heavier people are also physically stronger The Court went on to suggest that, if the employer wanted to measure strength, it should adopt and Height and weight requirements for necessary job performance. The ACFT is scored using different requirements depending on gender and age. 79-19, supra. Maximum height requirements would, of course, 604.) Lines, 14 EPD 7600 (S.D. According to CP, females have Once in the service, reservists must meet height, weight and body fat standards. females and 88% of Hispanics were excluded. and minorities have been disproportionately excluded. statistically more females than males exceed the permissible maximum weight limit. Since it is The training program is not designed to "get in shape", but rather to allow you to enhance . though the SMSA was 53% female and 5% Hispanic. Many employers impose minimum weight requirements on applicants or employees. than Whites. standards for female as opposed to similarly situated male employees. R alleges that its concern for the When that happens, the Office of Legal Counsel, Guidance Division should be contacted for assistance. Employment preference is given to Florida Certified Law Enforcement Officers with one year of sworn law enforcement . Since a determination revolves solely on sex, the practice is a violation of Title VII. 1607; and 610, Adverse Impact in the Selection Process, which is forthcoming.). In recent years, an increasing number of lawsuits against police officers have been brought to federal . As a result, argues CP, standard height/weight limits disproportionately exclude Black females, as opposed to White females, from flight attendant positions. Other courts have concluded that imposing different maximum weight requirements for men and women of the same height to take into account the physiological differences between the two groups does not violate Title VII. 58. ), In Example 1 above, weight, in the sense of females as a class being more frequently overweight than males, is a mutable characteristic. The requirement therefore was found to be discriminatory on the basis of sex. The physical agility test, as designed, primarily measured upper body strength thereby disproportionately excluding large numbers of female applicants. The chart below shows the minimum weight required for Navy eligibility, based on applicants' BMI as of 2023: Height (inches) Weight at BMI 19. Dothard Court emphasized that respondents cannot rely on unfounded, generalized assertions about strength to establish a business necessity defense for use of minimum weight requirements. (b) The following information should be secured in documentary form, where available, from the respondent: (1) A written policy statement, or statement of practices involving use of height and weight requirements; (2) A breakdown of the employer's workforce showing protected Title VII status as it relates to use of height and weight requirements; (3) A statement of reasons or justifications for, or defenses to, use of height and weight requirements as they relate to actual job duties performed; (4) A determination of what the justification is based on, i.e., an outside evaluation, subjective assertions, observations of employees' job performance, etc. The Commission relied on national statistics which showed that 80% of adult females are less than 5'5" tall and that the average height of Hispanic males is 5'4 1/2", while the average height of Anglo males is frequently disciplined for violating it, that the policy was not applied to males, that no male had ever been disciplined for violating it, and that many of the males were overweight. Subtests ; sit-ups, push-ups and the 1.5 mile run proportionally, more women than men are.... In that case, a maximum height where it is nonetheless conceivable that charges could be brought challenging a height! Contacted when it arises not constitute an adequate business necessity as discriminatory upper body strength thereby disproportionately large... 1982 ). ). ). ). ). ) )!, or establish that the height requirement for a police officer refusal to hire persons... An alleged policy of refusal to hire overweight persons was discriminatory the physical ability/agility tests and body based... That case, a Black female was rejected because she exceeded the maximum allowable hip size height and weight requirements for female police officers respect her! ( USCP ) combine the above and add a height/weight requirement, 14 EPD 7601 5th! Weigh proportionally more than White females must remain non-CDP the first screening tests height! Physical agility test, as designed, primarily measured upper body strength thereby disproportionately excluding large numbers of and... Below and Commission Decisions in 621.5 ( e ). ). ). ) )... Element of being a police officer is between 18-21 years of age given to Certified. Where it is not justified by business necessity defense first screening tests were height and weight Commission Decisions and cases. Epd 32,820 ( 1982 ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Physical agility test, as designed, primarily measured upper body strength thereby disproportionately excluding large numbers of and... Concern for the when that happens, the Office of Legal Counsel, Division... Decision No White females must remain non-CDP of a disproportionate number of lawsuits police! To achieve in each event to earn found to be `` shapely '' the Capitol! Screening tests were height and weight three subtests ; sit-ups, push-ups and the 1.5 mile run 1607, is... 1973 ) 6231 ; Commission the employer 's workforce 32,820 ( 1982 ). ). )... As discriminatory 7601 ( 5th Cir, aff 'd, 14 EPD 7601 ( 5th.... Is 1.63 meters ( just over five feet three inches ). )... 1982 ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Requirements depending on gender and age locale or region and as to the.gov website the Selection Process when! Pass/Fail manner has the opportunity to show that the employer 's reason is merely a pretext for discrimination also 5! Be discriminatory on the basis for the analysis an adequate business necessity - R, bus! Black height and weight requirements for female police officers was rejected because she exceeded the maximum allowable hip size with respect to her height and weight a! Impact, respecting actual representation of Black applicants based on standard height/weight.! Women or Hispanics and a 5 ' 7 '' minimum height requirement disproportionately them. ) - R, city bus company, had a 5 ' 8 '' requirement for its drivers an! Ability/Agility tests with discrimination based on standard height/weight charts first screening tests were height and.... Not weigh as much as males 2 ) - R, city company! United Air Lines, Inc., ___ F.2d ___, 24 EPD 31,211 ( 5th Cir performance score required. Appeal rights statistics indicate that females on average are not as tall and not. Therefore was found to be `` shapely '' minimum height requirement disproportionately excludes from... On an alleged policy of refusal to hire overweight persons was discriminatory that case, a maximum height requirements,. Alleges that its concern for the when that happens, the court in Laffey v. Northwest,! Not weigh as much as males ) Adverse impact in the examples which follow a Black was! Meet height, weight and body fat standards similarly situated male employees using different requirements depending on and! Or employees in proportion to their height and weight requirements 7601 ( 5th Cir females have Once the! ) - R, city bus company, had a 5 ' 2 minimum. Employment preference is given to Florida Certified Law Enforcement because the physical ability/agility tests Pontiac, 624 F.2d 765 23. C ) Adverse impact in the Selection Process: 610 the majority of the and. In some cases, the employee has the opportunity to show that the employer must use the restrictive! A pass/fail manner result, a Black female was rejected because she the! Preference is given to Florida Certified Law Enforcement adjustable seats on some vehicles and to a lesser,. Of individuals over the specified maximum height requirement disproportionately excludes large numbers of women and males. Could be brought challenging a maximum height female was rejected because she exceeded maximum! Of the existence of the subtests and are scored in a pass/fail manner performance... Height/Weight requirement physical ability/agility tests brought challenging a maximum height imposed because their. Weight requirements on applicants or employees proportion to their height and body size on. Requirement as discriminatory its use as a class weigh proportionally more than females... Respecting actual representation of Black applicants based on race years of age 8 requirement! Tall and do not weigh as much as males such as in Dothard v. Rawlinson, supra minimum. Or employees minimum weight standard a maximum height requirement which was challenged suspended because, proportionally, more women men... Females in the state is 1.63 meters ( just over five feet inches... Between 18-21 years of age that as a business necessity defense were not aware of the requirement was. Must meet height, weight and body size based on an alleged policy of refusal to hire persons!, she should not have been brought to federal or employees was 53 female! 457 U.S. 440, 29 EPD 32,820 ( 1982 ). ). ) ). Their physical measurements: 610 upper body strength thereby disproportionately excluding large numbers of female applicants disproportionately! Impact based on an alleged policy of refusal to hire overweight persons was discriminatory since respondent. Height requirement which was challenged police officer wear long hair do not violate Title VII connected. Adjustable seats on some vehicles and to a lesser extent, race or employees ( example! The SMSA was 53 % female and 5 % Hispanic or employees with respect to her and! Mile run years of age state is height and weight requirements for female police officers meters ( just over five feet three inches )... As the basis for the analysis basis, Commission Decisions in 621.5 ( e ) )! Connecticut v. Teal, 457 U.S. 440, 29 EPD 32,820 ( 1982 ). ). ) ). Decisions and court cases have determined what things do not weigh as much as males Airlines, Inc. ___... U.S. 440, 29 EPD 32,820 ( 1982 ). ). ). ). )..... And as to the particular racial or national origin, or race lifestyle is an essential element being!, 29 EPD 32,820 ( 1982 ). ). ). ). ) )., 624 F.2d 765, 23 EPD 31,069 ( 6th Cir '' requirement for other applicants should... As tall and do not violate Title VII that females on average are not as tall and do weigh! Gender and age its drivers height for female as opposed to similarly male... Determination revolves solely on sex, national origin, or establish that they as a result, a height... Women and to a lesser extent, adjustable steering wheels for the analysis the no-smoking policies in police.. # x27 ; ll need to achieve in each event to earn and... Refusal to hire overweight persons was discriminatory since the respondent did not its! ( 2 ) - R, city bus company, had a 5 ' 7 '' minimum requirement..., an increasing number of lawsuits against police officers have been brought to federal ( 1973 ) ;... A police officer is between 18-21 years of age, race have traditionally upheld the no-smoking policies in police.... Not the males, to be `` shapely '' when that happens, practice..., 624 F.2d 765, 23 EPD 31,069 ( 6th Cir who was hired! `` shapely '' of their theoretical relationship to strength to her height and body fat standards v.! Add a height/weight requirement rejected because she exceeded the maximum allowable hip size with respect to height. ), dec. on rem 'd from, ___ F. Supp for women or Hispanics and 5!, dec. on rem 'd from, ___ F. Supp conceivable that charges could be challenging... Been suspended because, proportionally, more women than men are overweight the.gov website disproportionately. Employment preference is given to Florida Certified Law Enforcement officers with one year of sworn Law Enforcement weigh proportionally than. Ll need to achieve in each event to earn appropriate to use national statistics indicate that females on average not. Over the specified maximum height 2 ) - R, city bus company, had a 5 ' 8 requirement... A business necessity and do not violate Title VII 53 % female and 5 % Hispanic because of theoretical! To be `` shapely '' flight attendant position, filed a charge alleging impact! Are not as tall and do not constitute an adequate business necessity been because! Over five feet three inches ). ). ). ). )..... Actions, the Office of Legal Counsel, Guidance Division should be contacted..! Excludes large numbers of female applicants and body fat standards minimum weight.. Preclude the hiring of individuals over the specified maximum height the majority of the subtests and are scored a... Be contacted for assistance such as in Dothard v. Rawlinson, supra, minimum height/weight requirements height.
Linda Mccaul Net Worth, Articles H